“Stalwart” user
Albert’s a dilettante: he likes reading interesting things on the internet; this isn’t part of some larger program to learn QC.
Albert’s skeptical of the value of memorizing bare facts as we suggest. He reviewed a bunch at first, but then stopped for a month. Then the search essay came out. He started reading, realized that he didn’t remember what a Tofoli gate was, then decided to reread the first essay.
“A lot of the questions are trivial. They felt like memorization. … ‘What is in the bottom-left corner of the Y gate?’ … You must have made those just for us to get thinking about the essay again. … Can’t you just look it up?”
When I pushed him on what happened when he re-read the essay, he acknowledged that because he’d reviewed the cards there so many times, it was much faster for him to read it a second time (30min vs. 4 hours).
He doesn’t pay attention to the levels or the completion screen’s graph. When I told him that more than half of his deck is at the 2-week level, he was indifferent. His sense of the emotional journey was… total flatness.
He loved the prose.
“It was like nothing I’d read before. … You lead with a very big question. Universe-scale. And you talk about it casually. That was new to me! Not only do you talk about it casually, but also analytically.”
He didn’t feel bad about marking any questions wrong.
Has read both essays
Has done 9 sessions
Read QCVC in two big batches.
Clicked “continue reading” on 04/19
His average level is 4.5, between 1 week and 2 weeks. Deciles:
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
So median card is 2 weeks.
G2r0R7RZtzR8FJuNeMTzmAVa9Cn2