Quantum Country second repetition session accuracy measures

These are the accuracy % scores of users’ first review sessions on Quantum Country questions. These numbers are limited to traces with at least 6 months of data, i.e. to skip non-serious users (a quick glance at the unconditioned data showed fairly small differences: lower accuracies overall, slightly different order but same shape of distribution).

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jVM73UQosMUjuuqSOyfxBp4I0oqhYZqXK0w1KIMjgGU/edit#gid=1240834815

Accuracies seem to follow a power law: 0.599x^0.113 (R^2=0.966)

See also:

Bottom ten questions, QCVC

0.3379790941
Who has made progress on using quantum
computers to simulate quantum field theory?
0.4432132964
What is the matrix representation of
the $Z$ gate?
0.4819277108
What’s an
example where the target state input to a CNOT gate is
left unchanged by the gate, but the control state changes?
0.5186335404
What is the length of $|\psi\rangle$ in
the Dirac notation?
0.5195530726
What are
three common names for the $\dagger$ operation?
0.5321428571
The net effect of a quantum circuit of CNOT
and single-qubit gates is to effect a ___ operation on the state
space of the qubits.
0.5977961433
What is the matrix representation of
the $Y$ gate?
0.5983827493
What entry
appears in the bottom left corner of the $Y$ gate?
0.6218274112
What is the
matrix representation of the Hadamard gate?
0.6226415094
What’s a quantum circuit that can
compute the NAND of two classical bits, $x$ and $y$?

Compared to first repetition

Nth worst in second repetition was Mth worst in first repetition (bottom 10, QCVC only):

  • 1 -> 1
  • 2 -> 2
  • 3 -> 4
  • 4 -> 5
  • 5 -> 9
  • 6 -> 3
  • 7 -> 7
  • 8 -> 10
  • 9 -> 6
  • 10 -> 8

So the second repetition’s worst 10 are the same as the first repetition’s worst 10, except a bit shuffled.

Query

WITH

withTotalTimestamp AS (SELECT *, COUNTIF(sessionID IS NOT NULL AND isRetry IS NOT TRUE) OVER (PARTITION BY cardID, userID ORDER BY timestamp ASC) AS sessionNumber, TIMESTAMP_DIFF(MAX(timestamp) OVER (PARTITION BY cardID, userID), MIN(timestamp) OVER (PARTITION BY cardID, userID), DAY) AS traceDays FROM `logs.reviews` WHERE isRetry IS NOT TRUE),

traces AS (SELECT * FROM withTotalTimestamp WHERE traceDays >= 180 and sessionNumber = 2)
SELECT ANY_VALUE(essayName) AS essayName, cardID, COUNTIF(reviewMarking="remembered")/COUNT(*) AS accuracy, COUNT(*) AS N, ANY_VALUE(question) AS question FROM traces JOIN `logs.latestEssaysCards` USING (cardID) GROUP BY cardID ORDER BY essayName, accuracy
Last updated 2023-07-13.