Dyson claims idleness is necessary to the best creative work

we can see the nature of the flaw which made his life ultimately tragic. His flaw was restlestness, an inborn inability to be idle. Intervals of idleness are probably essential to creative work on the highest level. Shakespeare, we are told, was habitually idle between plays. Oppenheimer was hardly ever idle.
—in the essay “Oppenheimer” by Freeman Dyson, via Michael Nielsen

Q. Freeman Dyson claims what flaw made Oppenheimer’s life ultimately tragic?
A. “an inborn inability to be idle” (essential to the best creative work!)

Q. Between working on plays, how did Shakespeare structure his time (per Dyson)?
A. He was “habitually idle”.

Q. What quote did MN send me when I mentioned that I was feeling burned out after 2024-05 Talk at UCSD?
A. Dyson on Oppenheimer, remarking that his tragic flaw was his inability to be idle (which is necessary for the best creative work).

Reminds me, too, of Quit Your Job - Wolf Tivy.

Last updated 2024-06-25.