If a reader remembers an answer in the context of the essay, they have an 8% chance of having multiple lapses in the next half year; if they forget, that rises to 30%. But the overall correlation’s not that great: In-essay Quantum Country reader performance partially predicts first review performance.
Performance in the first review session is a better predictor: only 5% of traces remembered at first review have multiple lapses in the following half year, rising to 34% when forgotten in first review. (This shift is congruent with In-essay per-question accuracies on Quantum Country don’t effectively predict which questions drive long-term lapses (but first repetition accuracies do))
Users who remember a question successfully both in-essay and in their first review session have only a 3% chance of forgetting that question in the next half year; 4% in the next year.
Slicing per-question (20210322120153), we see a strong predictive effect across all questions except the top few % “easiest,” which have too few lapses to measure. 25th/50th/75th %ile likelihood ratios across all questions: 2.3 / 4.0 / 7.1 (20210322120552)
Measuring number of lapses in half-year traces, for traces which last at least half a year, unconditioned. 20210322102651:
Extending that to a year, there’s very little change:
Conditioned on a successful in-essay repetition (back to half a year, to get more samples):
To put this another way: 30% of traces forgotten in-essay will have multiple future lapses; only 8% of traces remembered in-essay will.
Conditioned on a successful first review:
To put this another way: 34% of traces forgotten in first review will have multiple future lapses; only 5% of traces remembered at first review will.
Conditioned on in-essay repetition and first review both successful (20210322120946):
So a user-question pair with two successful first repetitions has only a 3% chance of multiple lapses in the first half-year. 4% in the first year.